With the stock market stubbornly refusing to settle down and
smooth out, Wall Street has been scrambling to come up with
"product" they can sell to gun shy investors.
One such new concept is the Lifestyle fund; an extremely
diversified package designed to be the single fund in an
investor's portfolio.
There are two general types of these funds, in which assets are
spread out across a wide range of stocks and bonds. In one,
securities are held directly, in the other, assets are held
through other funds.
Fidelity's Freedom 2030 is an example of the first type. It
targets a specific retirement date, and the cash and bond stakes
rise as that date approaches.
This type of fund has created a perception among investors that
its value will not drop and that it is safe. But, in fact, these
are no safer than a standard mutual fund.
Since we sold all of our investment positions on October 13,
2000 and preserved our capital, Fidelity Freedom 2030 has lost
39% (through 2/21/03).
Do you think that's an isolated incident? I'm not picking on
Fidelity, but here are some of their other Lifestyle funds with
returns over the same period:
Fidelity Freedom 2020: -34% Fidelity Freedom 2010: -22%
So much for perceived safety. The other Wall Street bright idea
is the fund of funds (FOF). It sounds good, but it actually
creates a double layer of costs; the cost of purchasing the fund
itself, and then the expenses of the mutual funds the FOF
purchases.
Take for example, the Enterprise Group of Funds. It shows an
expense ratio of almost 2% plus a sales charge of 4.75%
according to Morningstar. Tackon the underlying expenses and
you're paying out more than 3% a year in investment expenses.
If you're a new investor (with less than $10k), and have your
account at a discount broker, you can add a minimum of 1% per
year in fees just for the privilege of having an account. That
brings the total up to 4% in annual expenses.
Talk about adding insult to injury.
FOFs are sometimes being touted as the only fund you need no
matter what the investment climate. So, let's compare to see how
the Enterprise fund of funds performed during the same period as
mentioned above for the Freedom funds:
Enterprise Group of Funds: -35%.
The bottom line is that no matter what type of mutual fund you
choose, or what anybody claims it will do for you, you must be
vigilant and see if it does what you were told it would.
In investing, there is simply no such thing as a sure thing.
Sure you need to know how to recognize a good investment. But
just as important-maybe even more important-you must know when
to recognize that a good investment idea didn't work out, cut
your loss, and sell.
About the author:
Ulli Niemann is an investment advisor and has been writing about
objective, methodical approaches to investing for over 10 years.
He eluded the bear market of 2000 and has helped hundreds of
people make better investment decisions. To find out more about
his approach and his FREE Newsletter, please visit:
www.successful-investment.com
|
|
